About Me

Isn't this meadow soothing? Let's pave a road through it! I'm James Riswick and these are my random thoughts published daily.

Thoughts from the Curb

Car Reviews, News and Random Thoughts from Edmunds.com Automotive Editor James Riswick

Nov 19, 2008 - 2010 Mazda 3: It Ain't Broke, So They Didn't Fix It

2010 Mazda 3 -- Photo by James Riswick

"They're replacing the Mazda 3? What for? It's still so good."

That was the general concensus when I mentioned I was attending the all-new 2010 Mazda 3 press event. Even though the current 3 dates back to 2003, it's still holding up remarkably well -- we editor types are still throwing awards at it and its sales figures have consistently gone up. The 3 always drove like a junior sport sedan and its interior did much to back that up.

I thought this new car looked good, but frankly, I was expecting the worst in terms of driving dynamics. Thankfully, the 2010 Mazda 3 takes all that was good about the outgoing 3 and makes it even better. As Ruben Archilla, Group Manager for Mazda R&D, said, "Our customers were happy. We didn't see the need to reinvent the wheel."

CLICK TO ENLARGE 2010 Mazda 3 InteriorMost of the 3's platform is carried over, from its basic suspension set-up to essentially the exact same dimensions. The two four cylinder engines are now a bit more powerful, a bit more refined and a bit more fuel efficient. The base 3 i model benefits from a new five-speed automatic.

The many other changes and full driving impressions will be revealed in the future Inside Line first drive by Josh Jacquot, but here are a few of the latter based on my drive yesterday through the Santa Monica Mountains.

I first drove the 148-horsepower 3 i Touring with the five-speed manual. Starting this 2.0-liter four-cylinder up no longer sounds like revving up a circular saw, while power delivery feels a little smoother and a tad punchier. Even in this more basic form, the 3 carved through Topanga Canyon like a champ. I later drove a 2.5-liter 3 s Grand Touring with five-speed automatic transmission. Obviously there's a bit more oomph available, although like the outgoing car, it feels faster off the line than it actually is, running out of steam as revs rise. The steering has actually gotten a bit weightier and feelyer for 2010 in the s -- fancy that in this age of electric steering being slapped onto everything. With its smartly designed and beautifully crafted interior, I couldn't help but feel like I was driving a small Acura. In fact, I'd much rather drive the 3 than the TSX, which costs about 10 grand more.

After my experiences with this all-new 3, the king is definitely still the king. The 2010 Mazda 3 remains the car to buy in the compact hatch category, and in this weak economy, I'd even venture to say its worth a look for entry-level luxury shoppers -- it's that good.

-James Riswick

9:00 am | Categories: car reviews
Permalink | Alert Administrator
 
Add to:     

 
Comments
chavis10 - Nov 20, 2008 9:00 am
This car is ugly inside and out and the fuel economy is a joke. As the current owner of an '07 2.3L Mazda3 GT 5-door with automatic, I know how much fuel this car chugs. My '05 Mazda3 with a 4 spd auto sucked down even more to the tune of 17.5 over 32k miles with 85% city driving. My current '07 has achieved about 18mpg over 15k miles. Mazda was stupid by not addressing fuel economy on this car. I can't understand this atrocius new and button rich interior. What is up with that hideous grille and tasteless fender detailing? How could they so easily butcher such a nice looking car? The current 3 is the best looking car in the class by a wide margin and now it has slipped to the back. I don't care how it drives, this car is simply unattractive and I wouldn't be caught dead riding in one. My current 3 will definitely be my last Mazda acquisition if this is the future direction of their styling. I also hope they've address the ridiculous road/wind noise of this new model as the current one is quite noisey on the highway.
jriz - Nov 20, 2008 7:25 am
Rear seat dimensions remain the same. You're correct about the length difference.
ahightower - Nov 20, 2008 6:17 am
The happy face is growing on me. I currently have an 08 3i Touring. Would love to trade up for a '10 or '11 3s GT with leather, xenons, etc. some day. (Although I'd rather not have a car payment for a few years. Make that a '13 or '14.) It really is cool enough to snag a few luxury buyers, especially as cheap credit and leases become harder to find. It's become what the Jetta used to be in the '90's - the "premium" car for people who want to own a BMW some day. They say it's 3.5" longer. Does any of that come into the interior, or is it just bumpers that stick out more? The only thing I dislike about my 2008 3 is the rear seat leg room. Not a big deal since it's just my commuter car 99% of the time, but occasionally I do have a kid in the back seat.
porschecarrera - Nov 19, 2008 5:51 pm
One word: fugly.
jriz - Nov 19, 2008 5:46 pm
In this economy, anything's possible.
louiswei - Nov 19, 2008 1:01 pm
"I'd even venture to say its worth a look for entry-level luxury shoppers" James, I agree that the Mazda3 is the king of the compact sedan class but the above statement is pushing it a bit. I know A LOT of entry lux owners (myself included) and there is no way in hell that they'll step down to a compact sedan.
SubyTrojan - Nov 19, 2008 12:57 pm
Sweet! I hope I drive one sometime next year.
Add Your Comment:

To post a comment about this blog you must be signed-in