About Me

I'm the Pickups host here at Edmunds CarSpace.com - be sure to check out the Pickups forums if you have or are interested in one!

Recent Posts

November 2009

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930

Archives

Categories

CarSpace

The Big Rigs

We're gonna talk about the big ones... trucks and buses that require those 3 marker lights front and rear. Everything from dual rear wheel pickups to class 8 trucks to the bus that takes you to work.

Feb 12, 2009 - Finally! The 2010 Dodge Ram HD

As the former owner of a 1996 Ram 3500 and the present owner of a 2005 Ram 3500, I've been awaiting this introduction for quite some time.  It was going to determine whether I hung on to my 05 or started saving for a new one.

In my blog post on the 2009 Ram 1500, I noted three things that I hoped would appear on the 2010 Ram HD, and it looks like I scored on all three.  The front bumper is indeed fully separate from the body (unlike the 1500) so that auxiliary equipment like plows and winches can be installed easily.  The ST model offers an all-vinyl interior that you can get dirty.  And the front springs in particular have been uprated and it now appears that they may permit a snow-plow package for the diesel pickups (a Dodge first, Ford has offered it for years).



As for the truck itself...

Likes:

I like the overall design appearance.  Even though the cab is the same as the 1500 introduced last year, the HD doesn't have a "consumer" truck look to it.


I am very pleased to see that Dodge followed GM's lead and is using a steel integral fender on the dual-rear-wheel trucks.  Ditching the bolt-on fiberglass fenders makes for a cleaner appearance, more paint options, better build quality, and better airflow.


I do like the more aggressive hood and grille.  The 1500 has a smoother rounded look, while the HD has a chiseled grille, taller hood with extra clearance for the Cummins diesel, and even scalloped "louvers" on the sides.





The tow mirrors are slightly larger and incorporate a larger convex section.  And I appreciate the return to black-faced gauges with white markings...  I thought my white-face gauges on my 2005 were pretty cool when I got them, but after 4 years, that novelty wore off long ago, and depending on where the sun is, shadows can make them tricky to glance at.














Dislikes:


As I mentioned with the 1500, I'm no fan of single "uni-bulb" taillights.  My 2005 has separate rear turn/hazard lights, which means people behind me have a better idea of what I'm about to do.


While I like the hood itself, I am very displeased by what's under it.  The underhood access on my 1996 was excellent.  The 2005 is OK.  Dodge knows full well these trucks use a LARGE inline six-cylinder diesel, so hood length should be taken into account during the design process.  Not only is the underhood area more snug than my 05, but now they've added one of those huge black shrouds around the engine.  I guess in their research, they forgot to ask how many HD truck owners do their own maintenance.  When combined with the fact that the grille is no longer attached to the hood, anything in front of the engine (fan belt, etc.) will require the removal of this shroud... and I don't even want to think of what will happen if it's not tightly secured when it's reinstalled.


I'm a bit disappointed that the floor-shift for the 4x4 system is now limited to the base ST trim level and the off-road themed Power Wagon.  I have always gotten the "comfortable" SLT trim level, but now that means I must have the electric dash control for 4WD.  I had it on my 93 Ford F150, so I'm not a stranger to it, but I prefer the feel of that floor lever.  (I know everything is computer-controlled anyway, but what the heck.)

Surprises:
The Mega Cab is back!  Who knew they were actually going to retain this, with the introduction of the new Crew Cab?  But unlike the 1500, the HD line will no longer offer the Quad Cab (which is the equivalent to everyone else's extended cab model) - instead, they will offer the regular, Crew, and Mega cabs to the HD market.  This makes Dodge the only truck manufacturer with 4 cab sizes.









Overall, I think Chrysler did a pretty good job on the redesign... I'll give them a solid B grade.  Guess I should start socking away the money for a new Ram 3500 Crew Cab DRW 4x4... with the Cummins diesel of course!

5:21 pm | Categories: trucks, diesel, dodge ram, dashboard, interior, new design, chrysler
Permalink | Alert Administrator
 
Add to:     

 
Comments
rsholland - Feb 16, 2009 1:10 pm
Still think there's a market for a Rambox in these trucks. Not everyone buying a HD pickup is a hardcore contractor. We both know there are a lot of casual truck buyers who buy HD pickups. A Rambox could be very useful to those 5th-wheel towing horse trailers and the like, as well. Needless to say, I think Dodge should offer the Rambox in the 6'4" and 8' bed 1500 models as well. If they do that, then there's no excuse that I can see for not also offering it on the HD models, since they share the same fenders (except for duallys, of course).
kcram - Feb 16, 2009 11:00 am
But here's the caveat... the customer of this truck class who wants the utility body will buy a chassis-cab and get the aftermarket utility body they want. The pickup buyer in this class is doing so for the bed space. Dodge didn't even bother to design the RamBox for the 6'4" bed, which would have made it available on the regular and Quad cabs in the 1500. Someone buying a truck with a crew cab and just a 5'7" bed isn't concerned about bed space at all. These are people moving up from Ridgelines and Explorer SportTracs.
rsholland - Feb 16, 2009 5:34 am
KC, as with the 1500 models, a Rambox could be offered as an option. I'm sure there are some buyers who would welcome it. In the case of the 3500 dually, because the fenders extend out to fill the width of the extra wheels, a fender-storage compartment would not necessarily have to intrude into the bed area. Also, keep in mind that there are many commercial customers who opt for aftermarket utility bodies (which also only have 50" or so between the wheel wells like the Rambox models), instead of a pickup body. Having something like this on the option sheet might tempt some of those customers. I just think Dodge missed an opportunity here. Having a fender storage compartment option would help set Dodge apart from the other HD pickups.
kcram - Feb 15, 2009 6:36 pm
Bob, the RamBox has one flaw, which is why it's only used on the 5'7" bed on the 1500 -- it requires the inside bedwalls to be filled in all the way to the wheelwells. Thus the entire bed is only about 50 inches wide front to rear. That's not gonna fly with people who need every available inch (length AND width) of that 8-foot bed in commercial/heavy-duty use. Permanently giving up 20 inches of bed width for compartments you may not use all the time? Not worth it.
rsholland - Feb 15, 2009 8:04 am
More pics and info here: http://www.allpar.com/model/ram/2010-HD.html
rsholland - Feb 15, 2009 7:54 am
Pretty much as expected; however these may all be vapor-mobiles if Chrysler tanks, as just about everyone is predicting. Maybe Nissan will take over the Dodge truck division? Let's hope so,as I'd hate to see these not make the light of day—and for KC not to get his wish. :) One thing I'm disappointed in is that there is no "Rambox" option. Heck the 3500 dually version could have a closet-sized storage compartment in the rear fenders.
steve_ - Feb 13, 2009 9:08 am
Getting my 1500 brands confused. The Ram 1500 also got a poor rating.
steve_ - Feb 12, 2009 10:18 pm
I wonder how the 3500 would hold up in a side crash. The '09 Silverado/Sierra 1500 just got a poor rating in from the IIHS.
rearwheeldrive - Feb 12, 2009 10:00 pm
Nice truck. A future classic?
Add Your Comment:

To post a comment about this blog you must be signed-in